Skip to main content
Start of main content.

Anti-shark device cuts likelihood of attack by two-thirds

A surfboard-mounted shark deterrent device has been found to reduce the likelihood of bite by 66 per cent during testing off Western Australia.

Scientists found the Australian-made Rpela V2 also cut shark interactions such as a nudge by 38 per cent, potentially giving surfers extra time to exit the water after encountering a predator.

The rechargeable device costs $500 and clips into the surfboard’s bottom deck.

It produces an electric field around the surfer that overwhelms the shark’s electro-reception organs which they use to navigate and assess their surroundings.

The good news for sharks is the electric pulses do not harm the creatures and researchers likened it to humans moving away from unpleasantly loud music.

The testing was carried out at Salisbury Island southeast of Esperance, a remote hotspot for white sharks.

The work was a collaborative effort led by global engineering company Cardno, involving Bond University shark expert Dr Daryl McPhee and Ocean Ramsey, famous for free diving with large white sharks, and her extensive shark-related conservation work including movies. 

Dr McPhee said surfers rather than other water users were increasingly being bitten by sharks, raising the importance of personal mitigation measures designed specifically for boardriders.

While the risk of a bite remains low, a recent fatal shark attack on a surfer near Coffs Harbour in NSW is a sad reminder of what can happen. 

Dr McPhee said it was critical that all shark deterrents were tested so consumers could gauge their effectiveness.

“There are many different individual shark deterrents available but most, including some that are very popular, are not effective or have not been independently tested,” he said.

“This means surfers may put themselves at risk thinking they have an additional layer of protection when they do not.”

Dr McPhee said that overall, electric deterrents were the most effective. There are also magnetic, acoustic and spray devices.

“As well as the Rpela V2 we assessed in this study, electric deterrents developed by Ocean Guardian have been tested several times and have been shown to be effective,” he said.

“No shark deterrent is 100 per cent effective but when independent testing demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in interactions with sharks, consumers can be confident that safety is enhanced.”

The scientists conducting the tests have no financial relationship with the manufacturer of Rpela V2.

The research was published in the Journal of Marine Science and Technology.

More from Bond

  • Bull Sharks continue undefeated start to the season

    AFL Rd 2 wrap: The QAFLW girls take down their arch rivals and a new face stars in the QFA.

    Read article
  • Visionary airport masterplan but will connections keep pace?

    A modern airport can be so much more than just a place to get on a plane if done right.

    Read article
  • The Entrepreneurial Transformation of Tobias Street

    Alumna Tobias Street graduated with a Bachelor of Entrepreneurial Transformation and is now putting his skills to work in a role that's close to his heart.

    Read article
  • Investing and the new Bitcoin buzz

    The Bitcoin 'halving' is almost here, so what does that mean for investors and the future of Bitcoin?

    Read article
  • Culture war diminishes sustainable living need

    Most people would prefer to see much less animal suffering in the world so why is there so much resentment towards those trying to do something about it?

    Read article
Previous Next