General Information
This subject develops an understanding of the ethical concerns of architecture, its role in society in terms of meeting the needs and supporting the well-being of the individual and community, and in defining meaningful and lasting cultural identity. This understanding is acquired through the critical study of and immersion with selected noted architects and design practices to investigate their underlying ethical values, design approach and practice methods. This research will provide the foundation for the development of a personal architectural position and value set in order to define a model of future practice.
In preparation for experience in practice, students are also provided with an overview of the legislative and legal framework in which the profession operates and potential future speculations. Students also undertake a series of tasks that assist in the development of key skills and strategies for use when seeking employment in the industry, as well as a short workplace immersion to gain relevant real-world exposure prior to completing the architecture degree.
In addition to the understanding of a precedent architect’s ethical and conceptual framework, students will further develop critical thinking and decision making with regard to construction, material choice and detailing. Students will document and prototype the building envelope, skin and structure with consideration to constructability, weathering and aging, life cycle, embodied energy, material availability, use, services and wastage of a precedent project.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: ARCH13-131 Subject title: Design Ethics and Design Detailing Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: May 2024 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Internship: x4 (Total hours: 30) - Students will attend a discipline specific workplace for two days per week over 2 weeks.
- Seminar: x12 (Total hours: 36) - Seminar
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 54) - Personal project work
Attendance and learning activities: 80% attendance required to allow for contribution to team based in-class exercises and evaluation of progress. Attendance is compulsory for the work place internship. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- Francis D. K. Ching (2020). Building Construction Illustrated. n/a, John Wiley & Sons 512
- Atelier Bow-Wow Tsukamoto, Yoshiharu ; Kaijima, Momoyo (2014). Graphic anatomy 2. n/a,
- David Phillips,Megumi Yamashita (2014). Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture 2. n/a, Laurence King Publishing 224
- Harriet Harriss,Rory Hyde,Roberta Marcaccio Architects After Architecture. n/a,
- Mark Kingwell (2021). The Ethics of Architecture. n/a, Oxford University Press 151
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.
Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
| Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
|---|---|
| Subject code: | ARCH13-131 |
| Subject title: | Design Ethics and Design Detailing |
| Subject level: | Undergraduate |
| Semester/Year: | May 2024 |
| Credit points: | 10.000 |
| Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
|---|---|
| Delivery mode: | Standard |
| Workload items: |
|
| Attendance and learning activities: | 80% attendance required to allow for contribution to team based in-class exercises and evaluation of progress. Attendance is compulsory for the work place internship. |
| Prescribed resources: | Books
|
|---|---|
| iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
| Requisites: |
Nil |
|---|---|
| Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge. Assumed Prior Learning (or equivalent):
Assumes knowledge of architectural history, ability to draw and understand architectural construction, and equivalent design ability to that acquired through 1st year design studios (Creative Design Studios in Jan/May/Sept) |
| Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Critically evaluate and analyse architecture and design practice precedents; comparatively and in terms of progression to future practice.
- Provide quantitative and/or qualitative evidence for architectural design and methods.
- Develop, define and articulate an understanding of own ethical values and sense of integrity in architectural design practice.
- Demonstrate the ability to test and refine construction assemblies, material choice, and detailing in relation to technical and conceptual objectives through 2D and 3D documentation methods.
- Develop an awareness of statutory requirements of the architecture profession, of strategies to prepare for employment in the industry, and to critically reflect upon contemporary modes of practice.
- Develop critical writing and visual communication skills.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Journal Immersion and comparative evaluation of Architectural Practice and employment application 30.00% Week 5 3,5,6 Project§ Critical evaluation of architectural design response(s) informed by ethical principles, design methodology and architectural technology in a selected precedent practice. 30.00% Week 10 1,2,3,6 Project Developed drawings, details, and models of the creative project, with reference to the work of the precedent practice. 40.00% Week 13 1,4 - § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Pass requirement
Supervisors report
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
| Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal | Immersion and comparative evaluation of Architectural Practice and employment application | 30.00% | Week 5 | 3,5,6 |
| Project§ | Critical evaluation of architectural design response(s) informed by ethical principles, design methodology and architectural technology in a selected precedent practice. | 30.00% | Week 10 | 1,2,3,6 |
| Project | Developed drawings, details, and models of the creative project, with reference to the work of the precedent practice. | 40.00% | Week 13 | 1,4 |
- § Indicates group/teamwork-based assessment
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Pass requirement
Supervisors report
Assessment criteria
| High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
| Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
| Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
| Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A student who has not established a basis for an extension in compliance with University and Faculty policy either by 1) not applying before the assessment due date or 2) by having an application rejected due to failure to show a justifiable cause for an extension, will receive a penalty on assessment submitted after its due date. The penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment for every day late, with the first day counted after the required submission time has passed. No assessment will be accepted for consideration seven calendar days after the due date. Where a student has been granted an extension, the late penalty starts from the new due date and time set out in the extension.
Academic Integrity
Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.
Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.
If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.
Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).
As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.
For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
*Workplace Immersions to take place during the Semester Break _ Week 0 of May Semester
Workplace Immersions. Students will attend an architecture practice for 30 hours total during the term break (approx 4x 7.5 hour days) - exact placement days to be determined in conjunction with the host practices. Students are required to keep these days clear of work or other commitments in order to attend the compulsory work placement. A reflective journal will be assessed during the term.
SLOs included
- Critically evaluate and analyse architecture and design practice precedents; comparatively and in terms of progression to future practice.
- Provide quantitative and/or qualitative evidence for architectural design and methods.
- Develop, define and articulate an understanding of own ethical values and sense of integrity in architectural design practice.
- Develop critical writing and visual communication skills.
-
Professional Life of Architecture
Reflective Journal assessment due (20%) Seminars on the framework in which the profession operates.
SLOs included
- Critically evaluate and analyse architecture and design practice precedents; comparatively and in terms of progression to future practice.
- Provide quantitative and/or qualitative evidence for architectural design and methods.
- Develop, define and articulate an understanding of own ethical values and sense of integrity in architectural design practice.
- Develop critical writing and visual communication skills.
-
Exploring Design Ethics through Practice Operations
Creative Project assessment due (40%)
SLOs included
- Critically evaluate and analyse architecture and design practice precedents; comparatively and in terms of progression to future practice.
- Provide quantitative and/or qualitative evidence for architectural design and methods.
- Develop, define and articulate an understanding of own ethical values and sense of integrity in architectural design practice.
- Develop an awareness of statutory requirements of the architecture profession, of strategies to prepare for employment in the industry, and to critically reflect upon contemporary modes of practice.
- Develop critical writing and visual communication skills.
-
Methods of Design Detailing
Project Documentation assessment due (40%)
SLOs included
- Provide quantitative and/or qualitative evidence for architectural design and methods.
- Demonstrate the ability to test and refine construction assemblies, material choice, and detailing in relation to technical and conceptual objectives through 2D and 3D documentation methods.
- Develop an awareness of statutory requirements of the architecture profession, of strategies to prepare for employment in the industry, and to critically reflect upon contemporary modes of practice.
- Develop critical writing and visual communication skills.