General Information
This subject explores the unleashing of an individual’s potential within a rich, culturally diverse environment to reach meaningful, important objectives.
Coaching across cultures (or intercultural coaching) builds upon traditional coaching by systematically integrating culture. It is essential for managers as it enables more effective work across cultures and challenges a diverse range of assumptions. It propels managers and their teams beyond previous limitations whilst offering new options in the form of alternative ways of thinking, communicating, managing time, and engaging in various activities.
-
Details
Academic unit: Bond Business School Subject code: GMBA70-102 Subject title: Coaching Across Cultures for Managers Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: September 2023 Credit points: 5.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Online Workload items: - Directed Online Activity: x6 (Total hours: 24) - Webinar
- Personal Study Hours: x6 (Total hours: 36) - Recommended study time & reviewing materials
Attendance and learning activities: Participation in all scheduled sessions is expected. Students are expected to notify the instructor of any absences with as much advance notice as possible. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Others
- Please check this subject's textbook with BBT University on the BBT University Air Campus.
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.
Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Bond Business School |
---|---|
Subject code: | GMBA70-102 |
Subject title: | Coaching Across Cultures for Managers |
Subject level: | Postgraduate |
Semester/Year: | September 2023 |
Credit points: | 5.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Online |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | Participation in all scheduled sessions is expected. Students are expected to notify the instructor of any absences with as much advance notice as possible. |
Prescribed resources: | Others
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Understand how cultural differences influence on the real business world, such as thinking, communicating, managing time, and engaging in our various activities, through learning concepts and theories regarding cultural differences, coaching and leadership in a multinational environment.
- Understand how to work effectively across cultures when working with people from various organisations and backgrounds in an international sense.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Student Engagement Class participation and ilearn participation via discussion boards 20.00% Ongoing 1,2 Student Engagement A minimum of one (1) substantial comment per lecture is required and more 10.00% Ongoing 1,2 Written Report “Art and coaching across culture” 40.00% In Consultation 1,2 Written Report “Vision Global Manager” 30.00% In Consultation 1,2 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Student Engagement | Class participation and ilearn participation via discussion boards | 20.00% | Ongoing | 1,2 |
Student Engagement | A minimum of one (1) substantial comment per lecture is required and more | 10.00% | Ongoing | 1,2 |
Written Report | “Art and coaching across culture” | 40.00% | In Consultation | 1,2 |
Written Report | “Vision Global Manager” | 30.00% | In Consultation | 1,2 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless the Lead Educator grants an extension. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.
Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.
If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.
Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).
As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.
For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.
Additional subject information
As part of the requirements for Business School quality accreditation, the Bond Business School employs an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Subject curriculum
-
Introduction of Coaching Across Cultures for Managers
In this introduction, we will set the stage by defining and explaining key concepts, which will constitute a foundation throughout the course:.
-
Cultural Orientations Framework (COF)
The COF is an integrative framework designed to assess and compare cultures.
-
How to leverage our Sense of Power and Responsibility
How do you view your sense of power and responsibility, what can you learn from alternative perspectives?
-
How to Leverage Time Management
Approaches
How do you view and manage time, how can you reconcile the differences?
-
How to Leverage our Definitions of
Identity and Purpose
How do you define your identity and what are your purpose in life and cultural orientations affect your management?
-
How to Leverage our Organisational
Arrangements, How to Leverage our Notions of Territory
Boundaries
Structures and arrangements within organisations to delineate psychological territory.
-
How to leverage Communication
Patterns
How to communicate with people, do cultural orientations affect how you communicate? What can be learnt from alternative perspectives?
-
How to leverage Modes of Thinking
Different choices of behaviours and cultures leverage thinking styles.
-
Facilitating a High- Performance and High-Fulfillment Journey
Global coaching process to practically engage in global coaching.
-
Developing Cross-Cultural and Geographically Dispersed Teams
How coaching across cultures can help teams achieve sustainable high performance.
-
Developing Global Organizations through Organic Growth, Alliance, Merger and Acquisitions
Discuss how coaching across cultures can facilitate organisational growth, transformation and integration.
-
Coaching from Multiple Perspectives
Coaching across cultures itself will be placed into the global context of coaching from multiple perspectives.