General Information
Constitutional Law is a compulsory subject in the Bachelor of Laws program offered by the Faculty of Law. This subject surveys the fundamentals of State and federal constitutional law in Australia, including the following topics: the rule of law, judicial review, the separation of powers, principles of constitutional interpretation, legislative powers, executive power, judicial power, constitutional principles relating to finance and trade, federal/state relations and the principles governing inconsistency of laws. The focus of the subject is both doctrinal and socio-legal, it considers primary and secondary materials relating to the topics, and seeks to develop not only the constitutional problem solving skills of students, but a deeper understanding of the significance of constitutional principles in the operation of the Australian legal system, and in other jurisdictions.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Law Subject code: LAWS11-216 Subject title: Constitutional Law Subject level: Undergraduate Semester/Year: September 2017 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Lecture: x12 (Total hours: 24) - Weekly Lecture
- Tutorial: x11 (Total hours: 11) - Weekly Tutorial
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- Patrick Keyzer,A. Fisher,C. W. Goff (2016). Principles of Australian Constitutional Law, 5th Edition. 5th, LexisNexis
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Faculty of Law |
---|---|
Subject code: | LAWS11-216 |
Subject title: | Constitutional Law |
Subject level: | Undergraduate |
Semester/Year: | September 2017 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: |
Prescribed resources: | Books
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Pre-requisites:Co-requisites:There are no co-requisites |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge. Admission into a Bachelor law degree OR Bachelor of Laws combined degree OR approved Study Abroad or Exchange law student OR LAWS11-108 - Foundations of Public and Criminal Law (may be taken concurrently) |
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Demonstrate understanding of a number of constitutional law topics, such as: (a) Constitutional interpretation, judicial reasoning, and the characterisation process; (b) Principles governing the separation of judicial, executive and legislative powers; (c) Principles of constitutional change and reform; (d) The constitutional protection, or otherwise, of individual rights and freedoms; and (e) Comparative constitutionalism and/or Contemporary Issues in Constitutional Law.
- Demonstrate competency in legal research and analysis at an intermediate level, with creativity, initiative and judgment.
- Demonstrate professionalism, including a commitment to: (a) Learning and working independently and reflectively; (b) Behaving ethically, respectfully and responsibly; and (c) Managing time effectively and meeting deadlines.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Paper-based Examination (Open) Final Examination 50% Final Examination Period 1,2,3 Presentation Oral Presentation on Comparative Constitutional Law accompanied by one page handout 15% Week 4 1,2,3 Essay Skills Assessment 25% Week 9 1,2,3 *Class Participation Tutorial participation throughout the semester and comparative constitutional law activity in week 5 10% Weekly 1,2,3 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Paper-based Examination (Open) | Final Examination | 50% | Final Examination Period | 1,2,3 |
Presentation | Oral Presentation on Comparative Constitutional Law accompanied by one page handout | 15% | Week 4 | 1,2,3 |
Essay | Skills Assessment | 25% | Week 9 | 1,2,3 |
*Class Participation | Tutorial participation throughout the semester and comparative constitutional law activity in week 5 | 10% | Weekly | 1,2,3 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
Subject curriculum
-
Week 1: Introduction to Australian Constitutional Law
• Historical context; • Division of powers; Separation of Powers • Parliamentary sovereignty; • The Rule of Law; • Introduction to contemporary constitutional issues. • Principles of Constitutional Change.
-
Week 2: Introduction to Australian Constitutional Method
• Principles of Constitutional Interpretation and Characterisation; • Sources and restrictions on legislative power.
-
Week 3: Sources of Commonwealth Legislative Power: Trade and Finance
Topics that may be covered include: • Section 51(1): Trade and Commerce; Section 92: Trade within the Commonwealth to be free.• Section 51(ii) and section 55: taxation • Section 51(xx): Corporations • Section 96: Sections 81 and 83.
-
Week 4: Sources of Commonwealth Legislative Power: Governance
Examples of topics that may be covered include: • Section 51(vi): Defence • Section 51 (xxix): External Affairs.
-
Week 5: ‘Comparative Constitutionalism’
‘Comparative Constitutionalism’ or ‘Contemporary Issues in Constitutional Law and Policy’.
-
Week 6: The Federation
Relationships between the Commonwealth, State and Territory Legislatures • State Constitutions • Section 109 • Section 122 • Implied intergovernmental immunity.
-
Week 7: Executive Power
• Who is the 'executive’? • What is the scope of executive power? • Implied Nationhood power • The Republic debate.
-
Week 8: Judicial Power
• Principles of Commonwealth Judicial Power • Principles of State Judicial Power.
-
Week 9: Judicial Power (cont.)
• Principles of Commonwealth Judicial Power • Principles of State Judicial Power.
-
Week 10: Constitutionalism and Human Rights
• Express rights and freedoms • Implied rights and freedoms • The Bill of Rights Debate.
-
Week 11: Indigenous Australians and the Constitution
• History and Culture • Section 25 / 51 (xxvi) • Constitutional Recognition.
-
Week 12: Revision Lecture
n/a