General Information
Ethics and Enterprise Governance is a compulsory subject in the Master of Laws in Enterprise Governance offered by the Faculty of Law. This subject will examine the principles and rules regulating ethical enterprise decision making, and the consequences of non-compliance. Students will learn about the different ethical approaches to analysing ethics issues; the relationship between ethical analyses of business problems and legal, risk management, and commercial analyses of business issues; and strategies to help make decisions consistent with one’s own moral framework. The subject will use practical examples taken from different functional business areas and a range of industry sectors to shed light on the above.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Law Subject code: LAWS77-586 Subject title: Ethics and Enterprise Governance Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: January 2025 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Mixed (Face-to-Face) Workload items: - Workshop: x1 (Total hours: 6) - Workshop 1
- Workshop: x1 (Total hours: 6) - Workshop 2
- Directed Online Activity: x6 (Total hours: 12) - Online Modules
- Personal Study Hours: x12 (Total hours: 96) - Recommended Study Hours
Attendance and learning activities: Attendance at the on-campus workshop is required. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: No Prescribed resources.
After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List.iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications.
Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student.
To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
| Academic unit: | Faculty of Law |
|---|---|
| Subject code: | LAWS77-586 |
| Subject title: | Ethics and Enterprise Governance |
| Subject level: | Postgraduate |
| Semester/Year: | January 2025 |
| Credit points: | 10.000 |
| Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
|---|---|
| Delivery mode: | Mixed (Face-to-Face) |
| Workload items: |
|
| Attendance and learning activities: | Attendance at the on-campus workshop is required. |
| Prescribed resources: | No Prescribed resources. After enrolment, students can check the Books and Tools area in iLearn for the full Resource List. |
|---|---|
| iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the Learning Management System at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, class recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment, and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
| Requisites: |
Nil |
|---|---|
| Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
| Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Identify and evaluate complex ethical issues that arise in the context of decision-making in enterprise governance, especially as they relate to legal, financial and risk management issues.
- Demonstrate an advanced understanding of relevant theoretical ethical frameworks, applying them to ethical problems.
- Critically evaluate the ethical choices made by enterprise leaders when dealing with real-life examples.
- Formulate personal moral frameworks and approaches to ethical issues in the context of enterprise governance, as they apply to real-life decision-making.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Computer-aided Test (Open) Students must complete one online test for each of the six online modules @ 5% each 30.00% Ongoing 1,2 Student Engagement Students must engage with the subject material and guest speakers and contribute to class discussion 10.00% Ongoing 1,2,3 Case Study Students must prepare a case study analysing an ethical issue that arose in an Australian business enterprise and evaluate how the issue was handled. 30.00% In Consultation 1,2,3 Essay Students must prepare a reflection and analysis of an ethical problem that the student or someone they know has encountered in their career. The analysis will include student reflection of their preferred ethical approach and consideration of how applying that approach might have influenced the outcome of the ethical dilemma. 30.00% To Be Negotiated 1,2,3,4 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
| Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer-aided Test (Open) | Students must complete one online test for each of the six online modules @ 5% each | 30.00% | Ongoing | 1,2 |
| Student Engagement | Students must engage with the subject material and guest speakers and contribute to class discussion | 10.00% | Ongoing | 1,2,3 |
| Case Study | Students must prepare a case study analysing an ethical issue that arose in an Australian business enterprise and evaluate how the issue was handled. | 30.00% | In Consultation | 1,2,3 |
| Essay | Students must prepare a reflection and analysis of an ethical problem that the student or someone they know has encountered in their career. The analysis will include student reflection of their preferred ethical approach and consideration of how applying that approach might have influenced the outcome of the ethical dilemma. | 30.00% | To Be Negotiated | 1,2,3,4 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
| High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
|---|---|---|
| Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
| Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
| Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
| Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A late penalty will be applied to all overdue assessment tasks unless an extension is granted by the subject coordinator. The standard penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment per day late with no assessment to be accepted seven days after the due date. Where a student is granted an extension, the penalty of 10% per day late starts from the new due date.
Academic Integrity
Bond University‘s Student Code of Conduct Policy , Student Charter, Academic Integrity Policy and our Graduate Attributes guide expectations regarding student behaviour, their rights and responsibilities. Information on these topics can be found on our Academic Integrity webpage recognising that academic integrity involves demonstrating the principles of integrity (honesty, fairness, trust, professionalism, courage, responsibility, and respect) in words and actions across all aspects of academic endeavour.
Staff are required to report suspected misconduct. This includes all types of plagiarism, cheating, collusion, fabrication or falsification of data/content or other misconduct relating to assessment such as the falsification of medical certificates for assessment extensions. The longer term personal, social and financial consequences of misconduct can be severe, so please ask for help if you are unsure.
If your work is subject to an inquiry, you will be given an opportunity to respond and appropriate support will be provided. Academic work under inquiry will not be marked until the process has concluded. Penalties for misconduct include a warning, reduced grade, a requirement to repeat the assessment, suspension or expulsion from the University.
Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students according to the requirements of the Assessment Procedure Schedule A - Assessment Communication Procedure.
Whilst in most cases feedback should be provided within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, the Procedure should be checked if the assessment is linked to others or if the subject is a non-standard (e.g., intensive) subject.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
Support is available to students where a physical, mental or neurological condition exists that would impact the student’s capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks. For effective support, special requirement needs should be arranged with the University in advance of or at the start of each semester, or, for acute conditions, as soon as practicable after the condition arises. Reasonable adjustments are not guaranteed where applications are submitted late in the semester (for example, when lodged just prior to critical assessment and examination dates).
As outlined in the Accessibility and Inclusion Policy, to qualify for support, students must meet certain criteria. Students are also required to meet with the Accessibility and Inclusion Advisor who will ensure that reasonable adjustments are afforded to qualifying students.
For more information and to apply online, visit BondAbility.
Additional subject information
This subject is structured as six topics. Each topic will be presented in the form of (1) an online module and (2) a 90-minute session at the intensive workshop.| NOTE: specific topics in the Applied Ethics modules (Topics 3-6) are subject to change in order to keep them current and topical but will generally retain the structure of industry spotlight, big picture discussion, and functional focus.
Subject curriculum
-
Topic 1
Introduction to ethics, and the relationship of ethical analyses to other approaches to analysing business issues. The business case for ethical business conduct.
-
Topic 2
Theoretical approaches to ethics. Identifying your core values. Corporate purpose and its relationship to the business case.
-
Topic 3
Applied ethics: • Industry spotlight: ethical issues arising in the banking and financial sector. • Big picture discussion: corporate culture • Functional focus: human resources.
-
Topic 4
Applied ethics: • Industry spotlight: ethical issues arising in not-for-profit organisations enterprises including schools, charities, cultural organisations and sporting organisations. • Big picture discussion: cancel culture and possible business responses • Functional focus: marketing and sales.
-
Topic 5
Applied ethics: • Industry spotlight: the gambling industry • Big picture discussion: ethics and modern technology (covering topics such as hacking and businesses’ protection of customer data; businesses’ use of big data; and intellectual property issues) • Functional focus: the professions (accounting, finance, law, etc)
-
Topic 6
Applied ethics: • Industry spotlight: pharmaceuticals and the health sector (including aged care) • Big picture discussion: ethics and market based systems (the good and the bad) • Functional focus: director, officers and other leaders, and their responsibilities regarding business ethics.