General Information
Program management is the coordinated management of multiple related projects designed to implement strategies and deliver specific benefits, while portfolio management is a process for selection and prioritisation of projects and programs within an organisation. In both cases, considerable strategic awareness and judgement is needed. This subject therefore focuses on the monitoring and control of project or program delivery in the context of communications and stakeholder management and their alignment to organisational goals. In addition, students are exposed to the principles and application of program and portfolio management including project administration, project dashboards, earned value management, and the role that a project or program office can play in assisting control processes. A necessarily practical approach is taken to explore this area. The roles and responsibilities of the various professional associations that guide the future development of the global discipline and bear on personal career development are also examined.
-
Details
Academic unit: Faculty of Society & Design Subject code: SSUD71-305 Subject title: Project Portfolio and Program Management Subject level: Postgraduate Semester/Year: September 2022 Credit points: 10.000 -
Delivery & attendance
Timetable: https://bond.edu.au/timetable Delivery mode: Standard Workload items: - Seminar: x12 (Total hours: 36) - Weekly seminar
- Self-Directed Study Session: x12 (Total hours: 84) - Recommended study hours
Attendance and learning activities: Attendance at all workshops is necessary to get the best from this subject with the workshops building on the work of earlier workshops and pre-reading. It may be difficult to recover if you miss a day. Attendance at the workshops may be monitored and non-attendance may impact the final mark in this subject. -
Resources
Prescribed resources: Books
- Crawford, L, Aitken, A. and Hassner-Nahmias, A. (2014). Project management and organizational change. n/a, Pennsylvania Project Management Institute
Others
- Managing project communication.
- Managing project stakeholders.
- Managing project change.
iLearn@Bond & Email: iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au
Academic unit: | Faculty of Society & Design |
---|---|
Subject code: | SSUD71-305 |
Subject title: | Project Portfolio and Program Management |
Subject level: | Postgraduate |
Semester/Year: | September 2022 |
Credit points: | 10.000 |
Timetable: | https://bond.edu.au/timetable |
---|---|
Delivery mode: | Standard |
Workload items: |
|
Attendance and learning activities: | Attendance at all workshops is necessary to get the best from this subject with the workshops building on the work of earlier workshops and pre-reading. It may be difficult to recover if you miss a day. Attendance at the workshops may be monitored and non-attendance may impact the final mark in this subject. |
Prescribed resources: | Books
Others
|
---|---|
iLearn@Bond & Email: | iLearn@Bond is the online learning environment at Bond University and is used to provide access to subject materials, lecture recordings and detailed subject information regarding the subject curriculum, assessment and timing. Both iLearn and the Student Email facility are used to provide important subject notifications. Additionally, official correspondence from the University will be forwarded to students’ Bond email account and must be monitored by the student. To access these services, log on to the Student Portal from the Bond University website as www.bond.edu.au |
Enrolment requirements
Requisites: |
Nil |
---|---|
Assumed knowledge: |
Assumed knowledge is the minimum level of knowledge of a subject area that students are assumed to have acquired through previous study. It is the responsibility of students to ensure they meet the assumed knowledge expectations of the subject. Students who do not possess this prior knowledge are strongly recommended against enrolling and do so at their own risk. No concessions will be made for students’ lack of prior knowledge.
|
Restrictions: |
Nil |
Assurance of learning
Assurance of Learning means that universities take responsibility for creating, monitoring and updating curriculum, teaching and assessment so that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attributes they need for employability and/or further study.
At Bond University, we carefully develop subject and program outcomes to ensure that student learning in each subject contributes to the whole student experience. Students are encouraged to carefully read and consider subject and program outcomes as combined elements.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
Program Learning Outcomes provide a broad and measurable set of standards that incorporate a range of knowledge and skills that will be achieved on completion of the program. If you are undertaking this subject as part of a degree program, you should refer to the relevant degree program outcomes and graduate attributes as they relate to this subject.
Subject Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
On successful completion of this subject the learner will be able to:
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Assessment
The University acknowledges that Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) tools are an important facet of contemporary life. Their use in assessment is considered in line with students’ development of the skills and knowledge which demonstrate learning outcomes and underpin study and career success. Instructions on the use of Gen-AI are given for each assessment task; it is your responsibility to adhere to these instructions.
-
Assessment details
Type Task % Timing* Outcomes assessed Presentation Competency testing 20.00% Week 12 1 Portfolio 8 tutorial exercises with weekly formative and indicative summative feedback 80.00% Weekly 2,3,4,5 - * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
-
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria
High Distinction 85-100 Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. Distinction 75-84 Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. Credit 65-74 Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. Pass 50-64 Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. Fail 0-49 Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Type | Task | % | Timing* | Outcomes assessed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Presentation | Competency testing | 20.00% | Week 12 | 1 |
Portfolio | 8 tutorial exercises with weekly formative and indicative summative feedback | 80.00% | Weekly | 2,3,4,5 |
- * Assessment timing is indicative of the week that the assessment is due or begins (where conducted over multiple weeks), and is based on the standard University academic calendar
- C = Students must reach a level of competency to successfully complete this assessment.
Assessment criteria
High Distinction | 85-100 | Outstanding or exemplary performance in the following areas: interpretative ability; intellectual initiative in response to questions; mastery of the skills required by the subject, general levels of knowledge and analytic ability or clear thinking. |
---|---|---|
Distinction | 75-84 | Usually awarded to students whose performance goes well beyond the minimum requirements set for tasks required in assessment, and who perform well in most of the above areas. |
Credit | 65-74 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is considered to go beyond the minimum requirements for work set for assessment. Assessable work is typically characterised by a strong performance in some of the capacities listed above. |
Pass | 50-64 | Usually awarded to students whose performance meets the requirements set for work provided for assessment. |
Fail | 0-49 | Usually awarded to students whose performance is not considered to meet the minimum requirements set for particular tasks. The fail grade may be a result of insufficient preparation, of inattention to assignment guidelines or lack of academic ability. A frequent cause of failure is lack of attention to subject or assignment guidelines. |
Quality assurance
For the purposes of quality assurance, Bond University conducts an evaluation process to measure and document student assessment as evidence of the extent to which program and subject learning outcomes are achieved. Some examples of student work will be retained for potential research and quality auditing purposes only. Any student work used will be treated confidentially and no student grades will be affected.
Study Information
Submission procedures
Students must check the iLearn@Bond subject site for detailed assessment information and submission procedures.
Policy on late submission and extensions
A student who has not established a basis for an extension in compliance with University and Faculty policy either by 1) not applying before the assessment due date or 2) by having an application rejected due to failure to show a justifiable cause for an extension, will receive a penalty on assessment submitted after its due date. The penalty will be 10% of marks awarded to that assessment for every day late, with the first day counted after the required submission time has passed. No assessment will be accepted for consideration seven calendar days after the due date. Where a student has been granted an extension, the late penalty starts from the new due date and time set out in the extension.
Academic Integrity
University’s Academic Integrity Policy defines plagiarism as the act of misrepresenting as one’s own original work: another’s ideas, interpretations, words, or creative works; and/or one’s own previous ideas, interpretations, words, or creative work without acknowledging that it was used previously (i.e., self-plagiarism). The University considers the act of plagiarising to be a breach of the Student Conduct Code and, therefore, subject to the Discipline Regulations which provide for a range of penalties including the reduction of marks or grades, fines and suspension from the University.
Bond University utilises Originality Reporting software to inform academic integrity.Feedback on assessment
Feedback on assessment will be provided to students within two weeks of the assessment submission due date, as per the Assessment Policy.
Accessibility and Inclusion Support
If you have a disability, illness, injury or health condition that impacts your capacity to complete studies, exams or assessment tasks, it is important you let us know your special requirements, early in the semester. Students will need to make an application for support and submit it with recent, comprehensive documentation at an appointment with a Disability Officer. Students with a disability are encouraged to contact the Disability Office at the earliest possible time, to meet staff and learn about the services available to meet your specific needs. Please note that late notification or failure to disclose your disability can be to your disadvantage as the University cannot guarantee support under such circumstances.
Additional subject information
The focus of this subject is on project communications management, project stakeholder management and project monitor and control. It primarily addresses Program Learning Outcome #5: implement strategy and procedures for administering a portfolio of projects and programs to ensure value is maximised and outcomes are feasible and aligned to organisational goals.
Subject curriculum
-
Introduction
Understanding the concept of projects, programs and portfolios.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
-
Program Strategy Alignment
Identifies and implements activities within programs to align them with the organization's strategic goals and objectives.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
-
Life Cycle Management
Manages program activities required to facilitate effective program definition, program delivery, and program closure.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
-
Stakeholder Engagement
Identifies and analyses stakeholder needs and manages expectations and communications to foster stakeholder support.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Benefits Management
Defines, creates, maximises, and delivers the benefits provided by the program.
SLOs included
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Project Governance
Enables and performs program decision making, establishes practices to support the program, and maintains program oversight.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
-
Project Health Check
Focusing on the questions: Are we doing the right project and on are we doing the project right?
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
-
Project Recovery
Focussing on methodologies to identify troubled projects and the development of a recovery plan.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Culture and Change
Focusses on organizational culture and the challenges of change within larger project portfolios.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Leadership
Understanding leadership to help coping with the response to change of the team members in larger projects.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Communications Management
Understanding communication as on of the success factors for a project manager, especially managing larger portfolios.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.
-
Wrap-up
Going though the central learnings of all eleven previous topics, the students get a better understanding of the bigger picture.
SLOs included
- Show competency in project communications and stakeholder management.
- Apply earned value management techniques to assess project performance.
- Make recommendations regarding strategic portfolio and program alignment.
- Develop processes for project administration, review and reporting.
- Explore organisational communications from a stakeholder perspective.